Who are the new Ecologists?

09/18/05

Who are the new Ecologists?

Permalink 06:21:41 pm, Categories: Koinonia  

Who are the new Ecologists?
Managing the Media Environment in a New Age of Digital Dominance.

September 17, 2005
By Stephanie Bennett

At least since the 1970’s the emphasis on protecting the world’s natural resources has been increasing, particularly for those ecologically-minded folks known as “the environmentalists.” Today, in the nascent stages of the 21st century, they are often called “Greenies,” and though they were the first to sound the trumpet, with a call to “preserve the waterways,” “save the planet,” and “protect the whales,” their message has proliferated and has come to be normative in everyday life.

[More:]

Those who were among the many who sounded these early warning alarms, did so to largely clueless mass audiences; average people like me who – aside from taking care not to be a litterbug -- were mostly unaware of the way our lush green pastures and pure, flowing waterways were becoming increasingly rare sights.

The concern and voice of the ecologically-minded often seem radical – even ideological – but their wisdom has so oft proved true, and the small victories they have won have worked to turn back some of the disturbing trends of pollution and environmental degradation. In many cases, awareness has been raised, bills have been passed, and work has been done to preserve America’s natural resources. For example, large chunks of the Everglades are now governmentally protected areas in South West Florida; once-endangered species such as the American Eagle, Black Grizzly Bear, and the Northern Spotted Owl have been restored, are flourishing, and no longer are in danger of disappearing from the earth. The maverick mentality of yesterday’s environmentalists may not have been popular, but it has been much needed.

This brings us to consider the features of the landscape in today’s world. Are there important aspects of our environment that are in danger of disappearing? Steadily, our everyday lives are becoming cluttered with the tools of new media, so much so, that one might call the landscape of everyday life a sort of – media eco-system -- and the study of it, media ecology. You say I’m over-reacting to the preponderance of the tools of technology? Think about it: Interactive online games such as the SIMS or Everquest create artificial environments that simulate the community life that once was integral and unavoidable in America. Cell phones and palm pilots have become semi-permanent attachments to the hip and ear of many, sounding off in theatres, libraries, classrooms, cars, and churches -- to say nothing of the steady drone of ‘old media” such as the television and radio. At every turn our world is swamped with new media. It’s a veritable wetland of communication technology out there.

So what of other types endangered species? What about the danger faced by the Cognitus Habitus Humanus, that human creature who can think, plan, process and relate to other human beings in “real time,” authentically, honestly, and with a genuine desire for advancing and sharing the organic process we call, “life?”

Will Cognitus Habitus go the route of the Neanderthal? Will the fate of the human being, as some researchers and technologists hope and plan for, evolve into an amalgamation of the organic and the artificial? Will computer/brain prosthesis research that is “cutting edge” today become the vehicle for human beings to make the next great and natural leap in human evolution? Many technologists think so, and are making plans to see this happen in the near future. Take, for instance, the work of Raymond Kurzweil, inventor of the first commercially marketed large vocabulary speech recognition technology. As founder and CEO of KurzweilAI.net (applied intelligence), Kurzweil is also the author of several books, such as “The Age of Spiritual Machines, When Computers Exceed Human Intelligence, “ and the upcoming, “The Singularity is Near, When Humans Transcend Biology.” With software development and research that has helped those with disabilities compensate for lack or loss of human function, Kurzweil is just one among the many who are nurturing a shift in the way humanity is perceived at its very core. These changes are just part of the new technological environment in which we all are presently immersed.

If we would take the time to look a bit deeper at the way in which we use our tools of technology, -- look at mediated environment in which the bulk of the western world is presently immersed – look past the invisibility of the gadgets we use – we might see that dependence upon them for convenience sake puts the human race at risk of losing many normal human functions such as memory, relational skills, manners, civility, community, and numerous other social elements associated with the Human Experience.

Life is an organic process. From the dirt we came and to the dirt we will return. There is a connection with the earth that is undeniable, which is probably key to the reason people think of vacations as getting back to the earth. Although surely people do vacation in NYC or Las Vegas, the more common thought is beach, mountains, or national park. It’s part of the human experience to gravitate toward the organic. After all, human beings are organic beings, not robots. We may work with machines and cope well with them, but when we want a break, we head for the hills.

So, have you decided that I’m I a 21st century Luddite? Do I run the risk of sounding like a quack maverick, beating a drum that is drowned out by the much louder din of approximately 3 TVs in every household, 6 billion web pages, thousands of Internet discussion listservs and Usenet groups, and the presence of 159 million *cell phones in the U.S. alone?

Perhaps.

And so, you may wonder, “what does it matter?” What does it really, really matter? If humans can live comfortably within the confines of a concrete jungle of our various and growing metropoles and suburbs, if we can subsist on the barest of quiet spaces to organize our lives and relate to each other in splotches of conversation here and there through mediated means, what does it really matter?

Uh, can you say “quality of life?”

Lest we forget about a little something called “quality,” I am here to remind you. The gadgets that keep our lives crackling with communication also have the great potential to cut away personal quiet, one-to-one conversation, and family time that focuses on the people in the families rather than the media we watch or participate in together.

All this to leave you with a little reminder, and say, “knock, knock.”

Who’s there?

I hope it’s you, and not a reasonable facsimile of what once was known as the being called human.
===================

* reported by the U.S. Census Bureau for the year, 2003.

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: Chris [Member] Email
The most striking aspect of all this, at least for me, is how we control our use of technology. Someone once wrote or said, that guns are not dangerous, it's people that are dangerous. And there's truth in that.

Science discovers information about the universe, technology makes tools and gadgets based on that knowledge. Neither of these is either good or bad, I'd argue that such things are neutral. Take a mobile phone, a cell phone. Is it good, or is it bad? Neither!

Take a typical mobile phone user, good or bad? Ah, now we come to the essence of it! Someone who calls to say, 'Let's meet for lunch, are you free?', is making good use of the device. Someone who leaves it switched on during a concert is not! And between these extremes is a range of cellphone behaviours, good and bad and so-so.

We need to take care with all the new technology Steph mentions, in particular we need to be careful how we use it. This may call for some government regulations, international agreements, individual judgements, and above all awareness.

You are right, Steph, to sound a warning note. There is a need to alert people to the dangers, and they are real dangers. The mobile phone is just an example. One of the problems faced by the early environmentalists was that almost nobody took them seriously. Nobody listened.

I wonder how many are listening this time?

Chris
PermalinkPermalink 09/25/05 @ 02:16
Comment from: Steph [Member] Email · http://www.es-creative.com
Hey Chris -- thanks for your comments and perspective. As always, very refreshing!

There's one area that I see just a bit differently from you, and that is regarding the supposedly neutrality of technology. I just don't think the tools of technology are neutral. Certainly they do not have "a mind of their own," but their presence and pervasiveness create an environment that is persuasive. From my perspective, the digital landscape upon which more and more of us walk each day is encrypted (if you will) with heavy influence. The cultural sway reminds me of the undertoe that's present in the ocean on some days. It is invisible; we don't notice it, but it pulls us in quite distinct ways.

While I agree with you, there can be no inherent goodness or "badness" in the tools themselves (the only bad cellphone I can think of is one that drops calls in the middle of an important conversation :-), I do believe that new technologies don't just add something to society. Rather, they change everything! (This thought I have directly borrowed from Dr. Neil Postman).

Do you see my point, or do you still feel the tools of technology are neutral?

Thanks for the exchange!
Stephanie

PermalinkPermalink 09/26/05 @ 19:17
Comment from: Chris [Member] Email
I think we agree already :-) You wrote, 'there can be no inherent goodness or "badness" in the tools themselves', and I wrote, 'There is a need to alert people to the dangers, and they are real dangers'.

Clearly, you cannot change the environment without affecting everything. Providing people with cellphones or TV sets alters the potential in society, new things become possible for the first time.

For a parallel think in terms of a garden. Scattering fertiliser around changes things, some plants are scorched, others grow faster and larger. The balance is altered and there are many secondary effects that may be impossible to predict.

I think technology changes the human environment in much the same way. I suppose I'd still say the tools are neutral - but their effects are not. Maybe I'm splitting hairs! Are we coming from different directions but ending up in much the same place?

I reckon we are!

Chris
PermalinkPermalink 10/12/05 @ 09:38
Comment from: jimp [Visitor]
Thanks Steph for stimulating thought. Certainly it is the "information age", but no guarantee of "wisdom of application". Just as one fool can ask more questions, than 10 wise ones can answer. I doubt responsible use of techno could be steered away from abuse... abuse is simply easier. But then walking circumspect requires a full time vigilance... That's my thought anyway... JimP
PermalinkPermalink 05/30/06 @ 14:58

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))
This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.

Please enter the characters from the image above. (case insensitive)

September 2010
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30    

Stephanie Bennett's Blog

A quiet heart is hard to maintain these days, particularly if you're among the many who live in the cities and suburbs. When you visit my blog, why not take a little time to breathe deeply and linger over some non-essentials. Let's talk poetry, prose, music, and LIFE! If ever there was a time to embrace the simplicity of each moment, to notice the organic intricacies of everyday life, and to experience the joy of shared beauty, it is now. Artificial intelligence clicks at our heels, the world is redefining what it means to be human, and at every turn terror seems to be breathing down our backs. Life is too precious to abdicate our humanness to the technological bluff. So, please, contribute a word of cheer or a favorite quote, poem or musical review. I'm listening....

Search

Categories

XML Feeds

What is this?

powered by
b2evolution